Posts Tagged ‘Marijuana Users’

Should the government legalize marijuana for economic reasons?

Marijuana-related incarceration costs the US an estimated $1.2 billion/year (1). Police, DEA, and customs also add to the cost illegalization. So, savings could be achieved through decriminalization.

But legalization would open up a massive stream of revenue. The USA consumes roughly 14,000 metric tons of marijuana/year (2). Street price varies widely, but hypothetically let’s say $100/ounce (~$3.50/g). Government-regulated farms would probably cost a negligible fraction of that. So, let’s assume a post-legalization sales price of $3/gram, of which 80% is federal tax (the remainder being production, distribution, and vendor profit):

14,000mt = 14,000,000kg = 14 billion g x $3 x 0.80 = $33.6 billion. Of course, this is assuming that pre-prohibition levels were maintained.

Less tangible social benefits would include reduced incentive for gang crime, and reducing the ‘gateway drug’ effect (since marijuana users would no longer be purchasing from drug dealers).

(1) http://members.tripod.com/~ronmull/marijuana.html
(2) http://www.drugscience.org/Archive/bcr4/5Supply.html

And, just for the record, I don’t smoke marijuana, nor would I start if it were legalized.

ATTN MARIJUANA USERS! VAPORIZER QUESTION!?

I was curious. If you have used the herbal vaporizers to take your medical marijuana…. Do you know if you can use regular low grade marijuana in the vaporizer too? Like instead of medical grade Kush

Can’t the feds still prosecute marijuana users even if prop 19 passes?

because doesn’t federal law over-write state law?

Gobig Global: Law Enforcment Using Flying drone spies on marijuana users


Might want to start looking up.

Pot cafes open for marijuana users


www.buydutchseeds.com First pot cafes are open in US for marijuana users in view of its medical benefits.

How do you think the Obama administration will react when California legalizes Marijuana in November?

Isurvive either you are a very stupid troll which seems the most likely, or you are the most uneducated person who I have ever seen answer questions.

Marijuana users are not addicts Marijuana is more useful than aspirin.
Isurvive either you are a very stupid troll which seems the most likely, or you are the most uneducated person who I have ever seen answer questions.

Marijuana users are not addicts Marijuana is more useful than aspirin.

If California Prop 19 passes will state police still arrest marijuana users due to federal laws?

What are your thoughts on the legal herbal incenses aka Spice, K2….?

Here is an interesting article I found feel free to read it, and give me your opinions.

Don’t criminalize ‘K2,’ regulate it

The recent emergence in the United States of “K2,” sometimes called synthetic marijuana, is testing lawmakers to see if they’ve been paying attention to the failures of marijuana prohibition and will respond to K2 with enlightened policy.

The first stories on K2, or “Spice,” broke out with headlines labeling the mixture of herbs and spices, which are treated with a synthetic compound, as “fake pot.” K2 was virtually unknown until the media hyped up its presence at tobacco and novelty shops.

Under U.S. law, and in all 50 states, the herbal product is legal, and also unregulated. People who have tried K2 often report psychoactive effects that are comparable to marijuana, but notably less pleasurable.

When lawmakers consider regulating K2, they should keep in mind that the government has waged a futile war against marijuana and people who use the drug for decades.

For another opinion, click here

Elected officials have burned through billions of taxpayer dollars chasing marijuana sellers, bagging marijuana plants and jailing marijuana users.

Government-funded media campaigns have sought to scare children and adults away from marijuana with grossly exaggerated claims that using the drug will lead to death and mayhem.

Despite all of these efforts, the public has largely dismissed the myths and hysteria around marijuana and recognized that the drug has important medicinal benefits. Moreover, public opinion is leaning in favor of a regulated and taxed market for marijuana.

Researchers who have tested K2 identified synthetic chemicals that are thought to mimic the psychoactive component in marijuana. These chemicals are thought to act on the cannabinoid receptors in the brain much the way that THC — the principal psychoactive component in marijuana — operates.

What’s notable about these synthetic chemicals is that very little is known about them, and this legal alternative designed to deliver an experience like marijuana may actually carry more risk. Thus we have a supreme irony of drug prohibition: The government continues to criminalize marijuana — a drug with established medical value that has undergone exhaustive study — and entrepreneurs introduce a legal alternative to marijuana with ingredients scientists know little about.

Given this potential for harm, and the growing volume of sensational media portrayals of K2, some lawmakers have ignored the lessons learned from marijuana prohibition and moved to criminalize possession and sales of K2.

Lawmakers in Kansas, Kentucky and Missouri have already written legislation to ban the herbal mix. It seems that a reporter need only write an article about an obscure bag of twigs to spur a lawmaker to criminalize more chemicals and the people who use them.

Time and time again, elected officials have dropped the ball when it comes to regulating drugs. Lawmakers have preferred to lazily pass the responsibility of controlling a drug on to law enforcement and the criminal justice system.

The problem is, we know from marijuana prohibition that law enforcement has no control over the drug market and the criminals who run it. Criminalizing K2 will only worsen the devastating harm our society already suffers under drug prohibition. Rather than regulation of the supply and ingredients of K2, criminalization leaves the question of what goes into the product up to drug dealers.

Rather than passing regulations that bar K2 sales to minors, criminalizing K2 will essentially give dealers the green light to sell the product to whomever they please.

By choosing to ban K2 outright, lawmakers will also forfeit badly needed state revenue from K2 sales and instead commit millions of taxpayer dollars to investigate, prosecute and jail K2 users. Plus, researchers point out that hundreds of other known synthetic chemicals will easily reach store shelves once K2 is banned.

The sensible legislative response to K2 is to create effective regulatory controls on sale and possession. California and Maine have passed model legislation that formally regulates and taxes adult sales of salvia divinorium — another product with psychoactive properties — and criminalizes salvia sales to minors.

Lawmakers should deliver a knockout to prohibition and pass laws that will actually regulate and control K2.

By Grant Smith, Special to CNNMarch 3, 2010 3:32 p.m. EST

http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/02/25/smith.k2.spice.law/index.html

This artice is a few months old, and I am aware that Spice is not legal in all 50 states anymore.

Can State Police enforce Federal Laws?

Assuming California’s Proposition 19 passes on November 2nd, it will be legal in that state to consume marijuana and grow it for personal use–in conflict with Federal drug laws. Will state and local police be able to prosecute marijuana users under Federal law, or is jurisdiction reserved exclusively to Federal agencies?

I am aware that some states work with the national government in enforcing immigration law; is this the only area where such cooperation occurs?
The Supreme Court (in Raich v. Gonzales) has ruled that Congress was within its Constitutionally-prescribed powers in criminalizing marijuana.

What do you think about my persuasive essay on prop 19?

California is known for Hollywood, having several major cities, population, and its deficit. California is estimated to have a forty two billion dollar debt. Out of the 50 states in the country, California has the highest numbers in negative despite being the most productive states in the country. Which is why proposition 19 should be passed, the state will benefit tremendously from it. The profit from marijuana sales could also be used to help pay off the debt.

When marijuana is illegal, the government ends up spending unnecessary and ample sums of money just to interrogate marijuana users from the public. Some people may argue that smoking marijuana isn’t a serious and dangerous crime; it’s comparable to drinking with less health deteriorating consequences. The state currently spends tens of millions of dollars per year for keeping marijuana users on probation or parole. In addition to that, the government has to spend even more money for marijuana programs. The passing of prop 19 would solve California’s overcrowded prison issue; there would be more cells to contain vitally “danger to society” criminals. The legalization of marijuana also allows the government to stop spending money they don’t have.

Not only would the state be able to cut back on spending if marijuana was made legal, but the state could profit from marijuana sales. The profit made from the sale could be used to pay off the $42 billion dollar deficit. According to the state board of equalization, by charging people $50 per ounce, the state could make an estimated $1.4 billion dollars a year. The price would limit marijuana users from smoking excessively to a point where it starts to affect their daily lives. The state could use money to pay off the deficit or fund much needed programs.

By legalizing marijuana, the government would have more control over production. Legalizing proposition 19 would give the government control over distribution that would protect the public’s health. When marijuana is illegal, there are dangerous black markets on the streets. Without the FDA to inspect marijuana products, there are merchants who could lace marijuana with dangerous substances. If marijuana were to be legalized, there would also be decreased violence due to drug wars. If proposition 19 were to pass, the government would have more control, there would be cleaner drugs sold, and there would be less violence and lives lost.

In opposing views of prop 19, the passing of the ballot would have disastrous consequences. If marijuana were too available for the public, the side effects would be no different then cigarettes. There would be chaos in the streets. People may use marijuana “the safer drug”, but they may be lead to use worst and more harmful drugs. When children see adults smoke marijuana, they may be influenced to do the same. Lastly, if the vast population were to start smoking, there would be many reports of people with respiratory problems.

In conclusion, the passing of prop 19 would benefit the state of California. However there may be some undesirable consequences if prop 19 were to pass. Legalizing marijuana would allow the government to spend less money and profit from it as well. Passing prop 19 would make public safety more manageable. The state and industries would benefit from the legalization of marijuana no doubt.

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes